Lingerman v. Nave

Indiana Supreme Court

Lingerman v. Nave

31 Ind. 222

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 31 Ind. 222 (Lingerman v. Nave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lingerman v. Nave, 31 Ind. 222 (Ind. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, C. J.

Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.

The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, C. J.

Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.

The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ind. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lingerman-v-nave-ind-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack