Lingerman v. Nave
Opinion
Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.
The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
31 Ind. 222 (Lingerman v. Nave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.