Lingerman v. Nave

31 Ind. 222
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Elliott, C. J.

Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.

The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lingerman v. Nave, 31 Ind. 222 (Ind. 1869).

31 Ind. 222 (Lingerman v. Nave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State Highway Commission
340 P.2d 927 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1959)
Pierce v. Manning
51 N.W. 332 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Carson v. Funk
27 Kan. 524 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)
Ferrenburg v. Studabaker Turnpike Co.
37 Ind. 251 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Miles v. Buchanan
36 Ind. 490 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Tyner v. Adams
34 Ind. 401 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)