Ling Huang v. Mukasey

Ninth Circuit

Ling Huang v. Mukasey

314 F. App'x 9

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 2008

DocketNo. 04-70682

StatusPublished

This text of 314 F. App'x 9 (Ling Huang v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ling Huang v. Mukasey, 314 F. App'x 9 (9th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Ling Huang, a native of China and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration [10]*10judge’s order denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The agency’s decisions in this case preceded Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2004), in which we held that “Sael’s evidence compels the conclusion that Indonesia’s ethnic Chinese minority is at least a ‘disfavored group.’ ” Id. at 927. We remand for the agency to reconsider Huang’s claims in light of Sael. See generally INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Ling Huang, a native of China and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration [10]*10judge’s order denying her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The agency’s decisions in this case preceded Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2004), in which we held that “Sael’s evidence compels the conclusion that Indonesia’s ethnic Chinese minority is at least a ‘disfavored group.’ ” Id. at 927. We remand for the agency to reconsider Huang’s claims in light of Sael. See generally INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 F. App'x 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ling-huang-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack