Lineweaver v. Wright

Supreme Court of Iowa

Lineweaver v. Wright

36 Iowa 696

DecidedOctober 9, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Iowa 696 (Lineweaver v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lineweaver v. Wright, 36 Iowa 696 (iowa 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Cole, J.

— The only questions made by the appellant’s counsel arise upon the evidence and the instructions, and there is not one word of the evidence nor a single instruction containedin the abstract. Under our rules, therefore, no question is properly presented for our consideration. See “ Statute and Rules regulating practice in the Supreme Court,” 27 Iowa, 569, especially § 20 et seq., p. 573-4, and amendments, 7 West. Jurist, Sept. No. 1873; Ping v. Cockyne, present term.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole, J.

— The only questions made by the appellant’s counsel arise upon the evidence and the instructions, and there is not one word of the evidence nor a single instruction containedin the abstract. Under our rules, therefore, no question is properly presented for our consideration. See “ Statute and Rules regulating practice in the Supreme Court,” 27 Iowa, 569, especially § 20 et seq., p. 573-4, and amendments, 7 West. Jurist, Sept. No. 1873; Ping v. Cockyne, present term.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Iowa 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lineweaver-v-wright-iowa-1873.