Lines v. Benner

52 Ind. 195
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ind. 195 (Lines v. Benner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lines v. Benner, 52 Ind. 195 (Ind. 1875).

Opinions

Downey, J.

This cause was set on the docket of the circuit court for the sixth day of the term by the clerk, and the plaintiff had caused his witnesses to be summoned for [196]*196that day. The defendant had, for some reason not shown, summoned his witnesses for the fifth day of the term. In calling th'e docket for the trial of causes, on the fifth day of the term, the court called this cause, and, the plaintiff not being ready to proceed with the trial, the court, over his •objection, dismissed the action. Proper exception was taken to the ruling, and it is assigned as error.

Counsel for the appellee think the question is not properly presented, because there was no opportunity offered to the court, by motion or otherwise, to review or reconsider its action. ¥e think no such motion, etc., was necessary. No motion for a new trial was necessary. There was no trial. No motion to set aside a default was necessary. There was no default. The question is properly presented. The ruling of the court can not be sustained. 2 G. & H. 216, secs. 359, 360; Norris v. Dodge’s Adm’r, 23 Ind. 190.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with instructions to set aside the order dismissing the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heegaard v. Dakota Loan & Trust Co.
54 N.W. 656 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ind. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lines-v-benner-ind-1875.