Linert v. Foutz

Ohio Supreme Court

Linert v. Foutz

21 N.E.3d 1109, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1415

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 18, 2014

Docket2014-1940

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.E.3d 1109 (Linert v. Foutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linert v. Foutz, 21 N.E.3d 1109, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. ll-MA-189, 2014-Ohio-4431. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal and cross-appeal.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Robert W. Sehmieder II and Robert J. Evola, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning App. No. ll-MA-189, 2014-Ohio-4431. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal and cross-appeal.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Robert W. Sehmieder II and Robert J. Evola, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.E.3d 1109, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linert-v-foutz-ohio-2014.