Linen v. State
This text of 620 So. 2d 254 (Linen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions for robbery, aggravated battery, and aggravated assault. However, the record on appeal contains no sentencing guidelines scoresheet. For all offenses committed after October 1,1983, preparation and review of a scoresheet is mandatory. See Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2275, 114 L.Ed.2d 726 (1991). Unless it can be established after remand that a guideline score-sheet was prepared, and appellant sentenced consistently therewith, appellant will have to be resentenced.
Convictions affirmed; judgments and sentences reversed for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
620 So. 2d 254, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6753, 1993 WL 221421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linen-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.