Linehan v. Joost

California Supreme Court

Linehan v. Joost

2 Cal. Unrep. 171

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 14, 1883

DocketNo. 8095

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cal. Unrep. 171 (Linehan v. Joost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linehan v. Joost, 2 Cal. Unrep. 171 (Cal. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

The finding that the defendant, B. Joost, obtained from the plaintiff an assignment of the lease in controversy without consideration and through fraud and deceit is attacked on the ground that it is not justified by the evidence. We have carefully examined that which is relied on to sustain that finding, and have come to the conclusion that there is some evidence tending to support it. Such being the case, we cannot disturb the order denying the motion for a new trial.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The finding that the defendant, B. Joost, obtained from the plaintiff an assignment of the lease in controversy without consideration and through fraud and deceit is attacked on the ground that it is not justified by the evidence. We have carefully examined that which is relied on to sustain that finding, and have come to the conclusion that there is some evidence tending to support it. Such being the case, we cannot disturb the order denying the motion for a new trial.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cal. Unrep. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linehan-v-joost-cal-1883.