Linehan v. Hathaway
This text of 54 Cal. 251 (Linehan v. Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action of ejectment. One of the defenses to the action was, that the premises sued for were allotted to the defendant in an action of partition to which the plaintiff was a party, and in which she appeared by an attorney who conducted her defense throughout the entire proceeding. No appeal has ever been taken from the judgment in partition. But it is contended on behalf of appellant that said judgment is absolutely void. We cannot so regard it. The Court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the [254]*254subject-matter of the action; and its judgment, if erroneous, cannot be attacked in a collateral proceeding.
Judgment affirmed.
Thornton, P. J., and Myrick J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Cal. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linehan-v-hathaway-cal-1880.