Linehan v. Hathaway

54 Cal. 251
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
DocketNo. 6,372
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 Cal. 251 (Linehan v. Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linehan v. Hathaway, 54 Cal. 251 (Cal. 1880).

Opinion

Department No. 2, Sharpstein, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action of ejectment. One of the defenses to the action was, that the premises sued for were allotted to the defendant in an action of partition to which the plaintiff was a party, and in which she appeared by an attorney who conducted her defense throughout the entire proceeding. No appeal has ever been taken from the judgment in partition. But it is contended on behalf of appellant that said judgment is absolutely void. We cannot so regard it. The Court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the [254]*254subject-matter of the action; and its judgment, if erroneous, cannot be attacked in a collateral proceeding.

Judgment affirmed.

Thornton, P. J., and Myrick J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldwin v. Foster
108 P. 714 (California Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cal. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linehan-v-hathaway-cal-1880.