Lineberger v. Swain

111 S.E. 702, 28 Ga. App. 497, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 637
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1922·No. 12987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The failure to serve counsel of the opposite party with the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, as required by the rule of this court, is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error. It may subject counsel to penalty for contempt of court. Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Peeples, 9 Ga. App. 477 (71 S. E. 758).

2. No error of law is assigned, and the verdict is supported by some evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lineberger v. Swain, 111 S.E. 702, 28 Ga. App. 497, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 702 (Lineberger v. Swain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samples v. Ashley
179 S.E. 745 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)