Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction
669 S.E.2d 320, 362 N.C. 675, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 990
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction, 669 S.E.2d 320, 362 N.C. 675, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 990 (N.C. 2008).
669 S.E.2d 320 (Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Faucette
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
State v. Jeminez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
Basmas v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association
763 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Free Spirit Aviation, Inc. v. Rutherford Airport Authority
696 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Lynn v. Lynn
689 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)