Linebaugh by and Through Linebaugh v. Hyndman
This text of 524 A.2d 1255 (Linebaugh by and Through Linebaugh v. Hyndman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SAMANTHA LINEBAUGH, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND NATURAL MOTHER, ANNA LINEBAUGH, AND ANNA LINEBAUGH, IN HER OWN RIGHT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
HAYWORTH HYNDMAN AND SHERRY THOMPSON, DEFENDANTS, AND ADAM HONEGSTEIN AND MARYLA HONEGSTEIN, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
John L. Slimm argued the cause for appellants (Slimm, Dash & Goldberg, attorneys; Marc B. Zingarini, of counsel; Lauren H. Kane, on the brief).
Michael L. Testa argued the cause for respondents (Basile, Testa & Testa, attorneys; Richard M. Pescatore, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 213 N.J. Super. 117 (1986).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 A.2d 1255, 106 N.J. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linebaugh-by-and-through-linebaugh-v-hyndman-nj-1987.