Linebarker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Linebarker v. State

74 Ga. App. 337

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 10, 1946

Docket31313

StatusPublished

This text of 74 Ga. App. 337 (Linebarker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linebarker v. State, 74 Ga. App. 337 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

It'will thus be seen that the jury were amply authorized to find the defendant guilty of possessing more than one quart of tax-paid whisky in Troup County, wherein the Revenue Act had not become operative by a vote, under the provisions of such act.

The special grounds assign error on certain excerpts from the charge of the court, and also on the admission of evidence. We agree with the defendant that the charge was not free from error, but in view of the whole record, none of the errors assigned shows cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

It'will thus be seen that the jury were amply authorized to find the defendant guilty of possessing more than one quart of tax-paid whisky in Troup County, wherein the Revenue Act had not become operative by a vote, under the provisions of such act.

The special grounds assign error on certain excerpts from the charge of the court, and also on the admission of evidence. We agree with the defendant that the charge was not free from error, but in view of the whole record, none of the errors assigned shows cause for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 Ga. App. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linebarker-v-state-gactapp-1946.