Lindsley v. Eupopean Petroleum Co.
10 Abb. Pr. 107
This text of 10 Abb. Pr. 107 (Lindsley v. Eupopean Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lindsley v. Eupopean Petroleum Co., 10 Abb. Pr. 107 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1871).
Opinion
We must decline to look into the other exceptions in the case; but as the referee erred in not allowing defendants to open and close the case, the judgment must accordingly be reversed, and a new trial awarded.
Order accordingly.
Present, Ingraham, P. J., and G. G. Barnard, and Cardozo, J.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Abb. Pr. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsley-v-eupopean-petroleum-co-nysupct-1871.