Lindsley Bros. v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

Lindsley Bros. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 138, 1924 WL 26666, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 29

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided March 3, 1924·No. No. 2287·Published

Opinion

Martin, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a so-called re-reappraisement of imported merchandise made by a board of three general appraisers in proceedings begun under the tariff act of 1913 and concluded under that of 1922. The case has been submitted at present upon a motion of the Government for a dismissal of the appeal. The issue is identical in principle with that decided concurrently herewith by this court in the case of Scaramelli v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134; T. D. 40056). Consistently with that decision the Government's motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a so-called re-reappraisement of imported merchandise made by a board of three general appraisers in proceedings begun under the tariff act of 1913 and concluded under that of 1922. The case has been submitted at present upon a motion of the Government for a dismissal of the appeal. The issue is identical in principle with that decided concurrently herewith by this court in the case of Scaramelli v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 134; T. D. 40056). Consistently with that decision the Government's motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Lindsley Bros. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. 138, 1924 WL 26666, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 29 (ccpa 1924).

Pincite

12 Ct. Cust. 138 (Lindsley Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related