Lindskog v. Shouweiler
78 N.W. 1119, 11 S.D. 398, 1899 S.D. LEXIS 43
Opinion
Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that it has not been prosecuted with proper diligence. The objection to the motion on the ground that sufficient notice of the hearing was not given is overruled, for the reasons stated in Smith v. Hawley, 11 S. D. 399, 78 N. W. 355. Upon the merits of the motion, we think* appellant has excused the delay, and the motion to dismiss is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindskog v. Shouweiler, 78 N.W. 1119, 11 S.D. 398, 1899 S.D. LEXIS 43 (S.D. 1899).
78 N.W. 1119 (Lindskog v. Shouweiler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Hawley
78 N.W. 355 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1899)