Lindskog v. Shouweiler
This text of 78 N.W. 1119 (Lindskog v. Shouweiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that it has not been prosecuted with proper diligence. The objection to the motion on the ground that sufficient notice of the hearing was not given is overruled, for the reasons stated in Smith v. Hawley, 11 S. D. 399, 78 N. W. 355. Upon the merits of the motion, we think* appellant has excused the delay, and the motion to dismiss is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 N.W. 1119, 11 S.D. 398, 1899 S.D. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindskog-v-shouweiler-sd-1899.