Lindsey v. White

22 So. 2d 689, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 390
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 29, 1945
DocketNo. 6831.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 So. 2d 689 (Lindsey v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. White, 22 So. 2d 689, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 390 (La. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Plaintiff, C.E. Lindsey, alleging that on December 10, 1943, his minor son, Malvin Bruce Lindsey, was seriously and permanently injured while acting in the scope of his employment with J.L. White who was engaged in a hazardous business within the meaning of the Louisiana Workmen's Compensation Law and who was employed by J.B. Moore, a trucking contractor, who in turn had contracted with W.G. Ray to do the oil hauling in which his said minor son was engaged, brought this suit on behalf of this minor son against J.L. White, J.B. Moore and W.G. Ray, praying for compensation at the rate of Twenty ($20) Dollars per week during disability not to exceed four hundred weeks, and Two Hundred Fifty ($250) Dollars for medical and hospital bills. By supplemental petition, W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., and Maryland Casualty Company were made defendants and judgment was prayed for, in solido, against all defendants.

Defendant W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., admitted its drilling operations in Mississippi as alleged, but contended that it contracted with J.B. Moore to haul this fuel oil to the well; that Moore contracted with J.L. White to do this hauling for Four ($4) Dollars per hour for the truck and driver, which was the price that Moore would have gotten from the Ray Company if he had used his own truck and driver; that White made all arrangements with Moore's office; that the said Moore undertook to perform this service in the same manner — as far as the Ray Company was concerned — as he did all its other hauling.

Defendant, Moore, alleged that at no time did he occupy the relationship of contractor or subcontractor in the arrangement by which plaintiff's son performed the hauling service for the Ray Company; that at all times he acted for W.G. Ray and the W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., without remuneration and as an accommodation and favor and that he had no contractual relations whatsoever in the premises with either White, Lindsey, or the Ray Company; that he made no payments to Lindsey or White of any amounts and was in no way interested in the undertaking. In the alternative, and in the event he was held responsible, he prayed for an indemnifying judgment against White and the Ray Company and its insurer.

Defendant, Maryland Casualty Company, insurer of J.B. Moore, alleged substantially the same defense, and made the same alternative plea.

Defendant, J.L. White, admitted that Malvin Bruce Lindsey was sent to Mississippi, where the accident happened, with a truck owned by defendant, White, for the purpose of hauling fuel oil for the Ray Company, but contended that injury to said Lindsey occurred while he was working directly under the foreman of the Ray Company; that Lindsey, after taking White's truck to Mississippi, had placed himself under the complete control and direction of the foreman on the job for the Ray Company; that there was a change of masters and that defendant, White, was not responsible for compensation; that the above arrangements were made with Moore, who is a general hauling contractor and who represented to defendant, White, that he had a contract with the Ray Company to furnish trucks and drivers for the hauling of fuel oil in the State of Mississippi in connection with the Ray Company's drilling operations and that Moore agreed that the said truck would operate in Mississippi under Moore's permit to haul in that state and under Moore's insurance.

Defendant, White, in his answer alleged that the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York carried workmen's compensation insurance in favor of the W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., and prayed that it be made a party defendant, and in the event that White was cast in the suit, judgment be rendered in his favor and against Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York as well as the other defendants, in solido, for the same amount.

Exceptions of no cause or right of action were filed by all defendants. Minutes of Court show that on April 24, 1944, the exception on behalf of W.G. Ray individually was submitted and sustained although there is no signed judgment in the record. The others were overruled or referred to merits.

Each defendant denied liability and in the alternative asked for judgment in his favor and against the other defendants indemnifying him for such amounts as he might be condemned to pay to plaintiff.

All defendants seemed to agree that the injured employee was due compensation from the other defendants and each, either in pleadings or in open court, admitted the *Page 691 injury and disability to plaintiff's minor son as alleged in the petition and that the proper amount of compensation was Twenty ($20) Dollars per week for four hundred weeks, as well as the Two Hundred Fifty ($250) Dollars for medical and hospital expenses. The evidence adduced therefore was principally on the question as to which, if any, of the defendants were responsible for this compensation and whether or not such as were held responsible were entitled to be indemnified by their co-defendants.

The District Court rendered judgment against all defendants jointly. An indemnifying judgment was rendered in favor of W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., and its insurer, and against J.B. Moore, his insurer, and J.L. White, for a like sum; there was a similar judgment in favor of J.B. Moore and his insurer and against J.L. White. All other demands for indemnity were denied. Defendants were cast, in solido, for the costs.

J.B. Moore and his insurer, the Maryland Casualty Company asked for a "rehearing or new trial." After its refusal, these two defendants took a devolutive and suspensive appeal to this Court. Defendant, J.L. White, took a devolutive appeal. Defendants, W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., and its insurer, the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, answered the appeal asking that the judgment be amended so as to make the indemnifying judgment against their three co-defendants, in solido. Plaintiff answered the appeal praying that the judgment of the District Court be amended by casting all defendants, in solido.

[1] The finding of the trial Judge that plaintiff's minor son was an employee of defendant, J.L. White, was plainly and clearly sustained by the evidence of all witnesses including the facts as testified to by the defendant, White, himself. Young Lindsey had worked for White in Louisiana for some weeks prior to the beginning of this job in Mississippi. White went with Lindsey to the location in Mississippi, purchased there a Mississippi truck license, left money with Lindsey for the expense of operating the truck and directed Lindsey to haul the fuel oil as he might be required by the Ray Company's agent; to get their signature on the time sheets and to mail these to White at Shreveport. White submitted these to J.B. Moore and the W. G. Ray Drilling Company, Inc., received payment and remitted to young Lindsey the amount of his wages at seventy-five (.75¢) cents per hour. His contention that young Lindsey ceased to be his employee because he took orders from the Ray Company's foreman as to where he should secure and deliver the oil is not well founded. As the primary employer he is entitled to no indemnifying judgment against his co-defendants.

[2] That the Ray Drilling Company was the principal undertaker of the work within the meaning of the Louisiana Workmen's Compensation Law, Dart's La. General Statutes, Par. 4396, Act No. 20 of 1914, § 6, as amended, was not seriously disputed and is plain from the evidence. As such, it is responsible to plaintiff and in turn entitled to indemnity from responsible subcontractors.

[3] The principal question for decision is whether J.B. Moore undertook the contract to haul the fuel oil and in turn employed J.L. White or whether J.B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Southern Tupelo Lumber Co.
244 So. 2d 815 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
Wysinger v. Godfrey
86 So. 2d 597 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
Cahee v. United States Casualty Co.
86 So. 2d 631 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
Whitman v. Central Surety Insurance Corporation
41 So. 2d 116 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 So. 2d 689, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-white-lactapp-1945.