Lindsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lindsey v. State

290 S.E.2d 550, 162 Ga. App. 206, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3111

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 28, 1982

Docket63932, 63933

StatusPublished

This text of 290 S.E.2d 550 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsey v. State, 290 S.E.2d 550, 162 Ga. App. 206, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3111 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The defendants were convicted of selling marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Their appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. Calif., 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967), and in accordance therewith has filed a brief raising points which arguably could support an appeal. As required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have carefully examined the record and transcript to determine if there are any meritorious errors of substance. We have discovered none, and agree with counsel that those presented in his brief are without merit. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw, and we affirm the conviction. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348) (1980). We are satisfied that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendants guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

[207]*207Decided April 28, 1982. James B. Thagard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J, and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

The defendants were convicted of selling marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Their appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. Calif., 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967), and in accordance therewith has filed a brief raising points which arguably could support an appeal. As required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have carefully examined the record and transcript to determine if there are any meritorious errors of substance. We have discovered none, and agree with counsel that those presented in his brief are without merit. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw, and we affirm the conviction. See Snell v. State, 246 Ga. 648 (272 SE2d 348) (1980). We are satisfied that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendants guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

[207]*207Decided April 28, 1982. James B. Thagard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J, and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.E.2d 550, 162 Ga. App. 206, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack