Lindsey v. State
This text of 36 S.E. 62 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It is too late, after verdict, to complain that the proper questions were not propounded to jurors while they were being examined on their voir dire. See Smith v. State, 63 Ga. 168-9. And were it otherwise, a new trial should not be granted for such a cause when the questions actually propounded were, in substance, the same as those prescribed by the statute, and did not vary therefrom save in immaterial respects as to phraseology.
2. The evidence in this case, though entirely circumstantial, was sufficiently strong and conclusive to warrant a finding that the accused was guilty and to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 62, 111 Ga. 833, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-ga-1900.