Lindsey v. State

782 So. 2d 327, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, 2000 WL 127222
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 4, 2000
DocketCR-98-0553
StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 327 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. State, 782 So. 2d 327, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, 2000 WL 127222 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

LONG, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Lacedrick Lindsey, was indicted for 14 counts of capital murder arising out of the deaths of 5 victims: Joseph Henry, Diane Brooks, Jaquess Brooks, Joseph Brooks, and Jakela Brooks. Counts 1 through 5 of the indict[328]*328ment charged Lindsey with the murders of each victim during an arson or by means of explosives. See § 13A-5-40(a)(9), Ala. Code 1975. Count 6 of the indictment charged Lindsey with the murders of two or more persons by one act or pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct. See § 13A-5-40(a)(10), Ala.Code 1975. Counts 7 through 11 of the indictment charged Lindsey with the murders of each victim through the use of a deadly weapon “fired or otherwise” used from outside a dwelling. See § 13A-5-40(a)(16), Ala.Code 1975. Counts 12 through 14 of the indictment charged Lindsey with the murders of three of the victims who were less than 14 years of age. See § 13A-5-40(a)(15), Ala. Code 1975. The jury found Lindsey guilty of the lesser included offense of intentional murder on all 14 counts. See § 13A-6-2(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. The trial court entered judgments on the verdicts and sentenced Lindsey to life in prison for each of the 14 counts, with the sentences on Counts 1 through 5 to run consecutively and the sentences on Counts 6 through 14 to run concurrently with each other and with those imposed on Counts 1 through 5.

I.

Lindsey contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions for the intentional murders of the five victims.

The State’s evidence tended to show the following. In the morning hours of July 20,1997, Joseph Henry, Diane Brooks, and Brooks’s three children, 6-year-old Ja-quess, 5-year-old Joseph, and 6-month-old Jakela, perished in a house fire at their residence in Prichard. The call reporting the fire was received by the fire department at around 3:45 a.m. Firefighters responding to the call found the house engulfed in flames. Autopsies of the victims revealed that they died of smoke inhalation and thermal injuries. Investigators with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms determined that the fire had been deliberately set by ignition of a flammable liquid introduced into the residence through the front door. Firefighters discovered a plastic milk jug, containing gasoline and with a wick, in the front yard of the residence.

Testimony at trial indicated that Dewayne Jackson had been romantically involved with Diane Brooks — Joseph Henry’s common-law wife — and that Jackson was rumored to have fathered Brooks’s youngest child. As a result, there was an ongoing feud between Brooks and Jackson’s girlfriend, LaTasha Jordan. The women had filed complaints against each other with municipal authorities. There was testimony that on July 12, 1997, approximately a week before the fire, LaTa-sha Jordan, Dewayne Jackson, and members of their family, armed with guns and baseball bats, went to Joseph Henry and Diane Brooks’s residence. There, Jackson and Brooks exchanged hostile words, which led to a fistfight between Jackson and Henry. Testimony indicated that Henry got the better of Jackson in the fight. According to witnesses, after the fight was over, an angry Jackson shouted at Henry that he would kill him while he was sleeping.

Catina Sanders testified that on the day before the fire, she overheard a conversation in her living room between her then-boyfriend, Waverly Lindsey, and his brother, Lacedrick Lindsey. Also present, Sanders said, was Orenthal Mitchell. According to Sanders, Waverly Lindsey and Lacedrick Lindsey were talking about meeting with Dewayne Jackson in order to “smoke” someone named “Scooby” (Scooby was Joseph Henry’s nickname). (R. 192, 200.) Sanders testified that she understood the men to mean that they were [329]*329going to shoot or burn somebody when they used the term “smoke.” Sanders said she also overheard the men talking about getting paid by Dewayne Jackson; however, she said she did not know for what or how much. Sanders also heard the men talking about the fact that “Seooby” had beaten Jackson in a fistfight.

Later that same afternoon, Lacedrick Lindsey and Orenthal Mitchell asked Sanders to drop them off somewhere as she drove to the grocery store. Sanders testified that as she was giving them a ride, the two men put on masks made from pieces of cut black cloth. Because she did not want to be stopped by the police, Sanders asked the two men to get out of her car.

Shortly after Sanders returned home from the grocery store, Lacedrick Lindsey and Orenthal Mitchell arrived back at her house. Sanders cooked dinner, and after dinner, Waverly Lindsey, Lacedrick Lindsey, and Mitchell went out. The three men returned to Sanders’s house later that evening, and everyone, including Sanders, snorted cocaine. Sanders testified that at about 10:00 p.m. that evening, after they had exhausted their supply of cocaine, she and the three men went out looking for more cocaine; however, she said, they were unable to obtain more.

There was testimony presented that sometime after midnight, Sanders and the three men stopped their car at Johnny Bernoudy’s house. Lacedrick Lindsey went inside the house while the others remained in the car. Bernoudy, who was a friend of Lacedrick’s, testified that Lace-drick asked him for money, but that when he told him he had none, Lacedrick left. Bernoudy testified that it was about 2:45 a.m. when Lacedrick Lindsey came by his house. Sanders testified that when Lace-drick Lindsey returned to the car after talking to Bernoudy, he was carrying a sawed-off shotgun.

After leaving Bernoudy’s house, Sanders and the three men returned to her house. Sanders testified that before she went to bed that night, she saw Lacedrick Lindsey and Orenthal Mitchell leave her house. The two men were wearing dark clothing and black hooded sweatshirts, she said. Sanders testified that there was a light rain at the time. Later that night, a heavy rainstorm hit the area. When Sanders awoke the following morning, Waverly Lindsey, Lacedrick Lindsey, and Orenthal Mitchell were all asleep in her house. Sanders testified that wet clothing belonging to all three men was hanging on a bar by her back door. Although Sanders had not seen Waverly Lindsey leave with Lace-drick and Mitchell the previous night, the fact that Waverly’s clothing was also hanging up to dry led Sanders to conclude that Waverly, too, had gone out after she had fallen asleep.

Sanders testified that while she was cleaning up her yard after the storm, she found some torn black T-shirts that looked like they were made of the same material as the masks she had seen Lacedrick Lindsey and Orenthal Mitchell put on in her car. Sanders also noticed that the gas gauge in her car indicated that she had less gas in her car than had been in it when she went to bed. Sanders thought someone had siphoned gasoline from her car. After hearing about the house fire at Joseph Henry and Diane Brooks’s residence, and learning that the children were killed in the fire, Sanders notified the police and told them about finding the torn T-shirts in her yard and noticing that there was gas missing from her car. Sanders testified that about a week later, Lacedrick Lindsey left a message on her telephone answering machine, warning her that unless she told the police he had [330]*330nothing to do with the house fire, it was going to be “pretty fucked up” for her. (R. 234.)

Sandra Davis testified that she was La-cedrick Lindsey’s girlfriend in July 1997. Davis testified that sometime around 3:00 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seritt v. State
647 So. 2d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Rolling v. State
673 So. 2d 812 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Powe v. State
597 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Meyer v. State
575 So. 2d 1212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 So. 2d 327, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, 2000 WL 127222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-alacrimapp-2000.