Lindsey v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lindsey v. State

128 So. 210, 221 Ala. 175, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 208

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 1, 1930

Docket6 Div. 606.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 128 So. 210 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsey v. State, 128 So. 210, 221 Ala. 175, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 208 (Ala. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

Noting that form 90 (Code, § 4556, Form 90)-passed into the Code of 1923 at the same time with section 4912, into which the amended statute has been incorporated, and that the use of the form to include a charge of buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, “having reasonable grounds for believing that it has been stolen,” does not violate section 6 of the Constitution of 1901, which entitles the accused to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, and to have a copy thereof, the use of the form to include a charge of buying, etc., property “having reasonable grounds for believing it has been stolen,” is approved in principle in, the following cases: Smith v. State, 63 Ala. 55; Darrington v. State, 162 Ala. 60, 50 So. 396; Johnson v. State, 172 Ala. 431, 55 So. 226, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 296. Other eases to the same effect will be found cited in these cases.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J.

Noting that form 90 (Code, § 4556, Form 90)-passed into the Code of 1923 at the same time with section 4912, into which the amended statute has been incorporated, and that the use of the form to include a charge of buying, receiving, or concealing stolen property, “having reasonable grounds for believing that it has been stolen,” does not violate section 6 of the Constitution of 1901, which entitles the accused to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, and to have a copy thereof, the use of the form to include a charge of buying, etc., property “having reasonable grounds for believing it has been stolen,” is approved in principle in, the following cases: Smith v. State, 63 Ala. 55; Darrington v. State, 162 Ala. 60, 50 So. 396; Johnson v. State, 172 Ala. 431, 55 So. 226, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 296. Other eases to the same effect will be found cited in these cases.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 210, 221 Ala. 175, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-ala-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack