Lindsey v. Spillers

89 So. 2d 865
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 2d 865 (Lindsey v. Spillers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. Spillers, 89 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, .petitioner seeks reyiew of an order which in [866]*866effect denied a summary final decree in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. The Chancellor based his ruling on our decision in Rivers v. Amara, Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 364. We are of the view that the cited case does not necessarily control the case at bar. However, under the circumstances reflected by - this record we find no abuse of discretion in the conclusion of the Chancellor 'to deny the' summary decree.

The prayer of the petition is denied. .

DREW, C. J., and HOBSON, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivers v. Amara
40 So. 2d 364 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-spillers-fla-1956.