Lindsey v. Kenan

133 Ala. 532
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 133 Ala. 532 (Lindsey v. Kenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. Kenan, 133 Ala. 532 (Ala. 1901).

Opinion

SHARPE, J.

That which is incorporated in the transcript as a bill of exceptions purports to have been signed after the adjournment of the term of court at which trial was had, and there is neither order of court nor agreement extending time for signing. In it there is a recital to effect that it was signed within the time allowed by an order of the court; but that recital, being merely a statement of the judge, cannot be looked to as establishing an order of court, the proper evidence of its existence being a transcript of the order. — Dantzler v. Swift Creek Mill Co., 128 Ala. 410.

The assignments of error are each based on matters which could only be shown by a bill of exceptions, and since the supposed bill is not legally authenticated, the assignments are without support.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dantzler & Sons v. Swift Creek Mill Co.
128 Ala. 410 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 Ala. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-kenan-ala-1901.