Home/Supreme Court/Lindsey v. Indiana

Lindsey v. Indiana

137 S. Ct. 32, 196 L. Ed. 2d 5, 85 U.S.L.W. 3137, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4857
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2016
DocketNo. 15–7813.
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S. Ct. 32 (Lindsey v. Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. Indiana, 137 S. Ct. 32, 196 L. Ed. 2d 5, 85 U.S.L.W. 3137, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4857 (U.S. 2016).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District for further consideration in light of the position asserted by Indiana in its brief for the respondent filed on May 23, 2016.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice THOMAS, and Justice ALITO dissent for the reasons stated in Nunez v. United States, 554 U.S. 911, 912, 128 S.Ct. 2990, 171 L.Ed.2d 879 (2008) (SCALIA, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nunez v. United States
128 S. Ct. 2990 (Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 32, 196 L. Ed. 2d 5, 85 U.S.L.W. 3137, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 4857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-indiana-scotus-2016.