Lindsey v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of Tangipahoa Parish
This text of 193 So. 3d 1160 (Lindsey v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of Tangipahoa Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
h Granted. The district court did not err in finding there were sufficient facts in dispute to preclude summary judgment, even though plaintiff has not produced any expert testimony in support of her claims. See Pfiffner v. Correa, 94-0924, 94-0963, 94-0992 (La.10/17/94), 643 So.2d 1228 (explaining expert testimony is not always necessary in order for a plaintiff to meet his burden of proof in establishing a medical malpractice claim).
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court denying summary judgment is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 So. 3d 1160, 2016 La. LEXIS 1375, 2016 WL 3172343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-hospital-service-district-no-1-of-tangipahoa-parish-la-2016.