Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership
This text of 582 F. App'x 182 (Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s orders denying her fifth motion to set aside the judgment, her motion to recuse the district court judge, and her motion for reconsideration. By these motions, Lindsey sought to challenge the district court’s February 2012 order granting [183]*183summary judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2014 & Apr. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 F. App'x 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-highwoods-realty-ltd-partnership-ca4-2014.