Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership

474 F. App'x 250
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1223
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 250 (Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership, 474 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent [251]*251application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN, 2012 WL 368328 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2012) & (Apr. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-highwoods-realty-ltd-partnership-ca4-2012.