Lindsey v. Conner
This text of 11 Ind. 278 (Lindsey v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit on a promissory note. Finding and judgment for the plaintiff.
The errors complained of are—
1. That the demurrer should have been sustained to the complaint.
The record does not show that any was filed.
2. Error in the amount of the judgment.
The evidence is not in the record; and the judgment appears to be for the amount of the note declared on, and interest.
3. In overruling the motion for a new trial.
There was no exception to the ruling of the Court on the motion.
The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ind. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-conner-ind-1858.