Lindsey v. City of Atlanta
This text of 191 S.E. 467 (Lindsey v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court did not err in refusing an injunction in this ease. See McKown v. Atlanta, 184 Ga. 221 (190 S. E. 571), where it was held: “The business of selling at retail malt beverages in a city of this State, from its nature, admits of strict regulation under the police power, and is different from the business of selling-drugs, sodas, etc. Campbell v. Thomasville, 6 Ga. App. 212 (64 S. E. 815). In the Campbell case, there cited, it was held: “A regulation that ‘near beer’ stands shall not be kept open during night hours, or on Sundays, election days, or legal holidays, is valid.” And these rulings are supported by principles laid down by this court in Morris v. Rome, 10 Ga. 532, Karwisch v. Atlanta, 44 Ga. 204, and Ison v. Griffin, 98 Ga. 623 (25 S. E. 611).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 S.E. 467, 184 Ga. 449, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1937.