Lindsey v. City of Atlanta

191 S.E. 467, 184 Ga. 449, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1937·No. No. 11817·Published

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

The court did not err in refusing an injunction in this ease. See McKown v. Atlanta, 184 Ga. 221 (190 S. E. 571), where it was held: “The business of selling at retail malt beverages in a city of this State, from its nature, admits of strict regulation under the police power, and is different from the business of selling-drugs, sodas, etc. Campbell v. Thomasville, 6 Ga. App. 212 (64 S. E. 815). In the Campbell case, there cited, it was held: “A regulation that ‘near beer’ stands shall not be kept open during night hours, or on Sundays, election days, or legal holidays, is valid.” And these rulings are supported by principles laid down by this court in Morris v. Rome, 10 Ga. 532, Karwisch v. Atlanta, 44 Ga. 204, and Ison v. Griffin, 98 Ga. 623 (25 S. E. 611).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Wellborn'R. Ellis and A. L. Henson, for plaintiff. ' J. C. Savage, G. S. Winn, Bond Almand, and J. G. Murphy, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsey v. City of Atlanta, 191 S.E. 467, 184 Ga. 449, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 545 (Ga. 1937).

191 S.E. 467 (Lindsey v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. City Council of Rome
10 Ga. 532 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1851)
Karwisch v. Mayor of Atlanta
44 Ga. 204 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1871)
Ison v. Mayor of Griffin
25 S.E. 611 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
McKown v. City of Atlanta
190 S.E. 571 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Campbell v. City of Thomasville
64 S.E. 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)