Lindsey v. Campola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindsey v. Campola

246 A.D. 662

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 662 (Lindsey v. Campola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsey v. Campola, 246 A.D. 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Montgomery Trial and Special Term of the Supreme Court denying appellant’s motion for a change of place of trial from Schenectady county to Oneida county on the grounds that the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted therebjL The defendant Lovely has not joined in the motion. The actions are in negligence, resulting from a collision between two automobiles. Plaintiffs were riding in the vehicle belonging to the defendant Lovely, which was involved in a collision with the vehicle of the appellant. Under existing conditions of means of travel no party or witness would be seriously inconvenienced if the trial were held in either county. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Montgomery Trial and Special Term of the Supreme Court denying appellant’s motion for a change of place of trial from Schenectady county to Oneida county on the grounds that the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted therebjL The defendant Lovely has not joined in the motion. The actions are in negligence, resulting from a collision between two automobiles. Plaintiffs were riding in the vehicle belonging to the defendant Lovely, which was involved in a collision with the vehicle of the appellant. Under existing conditions of means of travel no party or witness would be seriously inconvenienced if the trial were held in either county. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-campola-nyappdiv-1935.