Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.
562 S.E.2d 420, 355 N.C. 487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 S.E.2d 668 →
Opinion
Ralph LINDSEY, Jr.
v.
BODDIE-NOELL ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Hardee's Skat-Thru.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. by L.P. McLendon, Jr., Greensboro; John W. Ormand III, Raleigh; and Teresa DeLoatch Bryant, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.
Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P. by H. Lee Evans, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc., 562 S.E.2d 420, 355 N.C. 487 (N.C. 2002).
562 S.E.2d 420 (Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lindsey v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc.
562 S.E.2d 420 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)