Lindsey v. Allen

36 A. 840, 19 R.I. 721, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 18, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 A. 840 (Lindsey v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. Allen, 36 A. 840, 19 R.I. 721, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 17 (R.I. 1897).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover money paid for a tax, under a void levy on the plaintiff’s estate. The agreed statement of facts shows that the tax was assessed against Robert E. Wilcox, who was, at the time of the assessment, the owner of the real estate on which it was assessed. Subsequently the plaintiff became the purchaser of the real estate. After the expiration of more than two years from the assessment, when, under the provisions of the statute, the tax had ceased to be a lien on the real *722 estate, the collector levied his warrant upon it for the collection of the tax. Thereupon the plaintiff paid the tax, and now sues to recover the amount paid.

P. H. Quinn, for plaintiffs. Albert It. Greene, for town treasurer. •Benjamin W. Smith, for collector of taxes.

It is well settled that a payment under stress of legal process is compulsory, and if unlawfully exacted may he rer covered. 2 Desty on Taxation, 795, and cases cited. In Dunnell v. Newell, 15 R. I. 233, this court held that the mere holding by a collector of a warrant to collect a tax by levy or distress was not of itself, and before any step was taken or threat of enforcement by levy or distress, sufficient to make a payment compulsory. The present case differs from that in this — that a step had been taken against the plaintiff’s property by a levy thereon. The only remedy which the plaintiff had, therefore, was either to pay the tax or take the chance of defeating the sale of his property upon the ground that the levy Avas void. In our opinion, therefore, the payment amounted to a compulsory payment, and hence the plaintiff on this ground is entitled to recover from the collector, in whose hands the money still remains. As the money has not come into the possession of the town, the town treasurer is not a proper party to the suit, and it must be dismissed as to him.

Case remitted to the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, with direction to enter judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant Blackmar for his debt and costs, and judgment against the plaintiff for the defendant Allen for costs, the costs in both judgments to include the costs in this court;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Hopkins
51 F.2d 159 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A. 840, 19 R.I. 721, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-allen-ri-1897.