Lindsey v. Allen

43 S.E. 49, 116 Ga. 810, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 278
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 13, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

The rulings made when this ease was formerly before this court(Allen v. Lindsey, 113 Ga. 521) adjudicate adversely to the plaintiffs in error all questions presented by the present bill of exceptions. It was, therefore, not erroneous for the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent. John B. I. Smith, for plaintiffs. M. W. Beck, Y. A. Wright, and B. P. Bailey, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsey v. Allen, 43 S.E. 49, 116 Ga. 810, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 278 (Ga. 1902).

43 S.E. 49 (Lindsey v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lankford v. Tanner
52 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Rivers v. Brown
36 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)