Lindsay v. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Lindsay v. White

71 N.E. 1142, 162 Ind. 695, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 105

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 1, 1904

DocketNo. 20,306

StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.E. 1142 (Lindsay v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsay v. White, 71 N.E. 1142, 162 Ind. 695, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 105 (Ind. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Dowling, J.

The only questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, and not waived by the failure of counsel to discuss them, are thekame as in Brooks v. State, ex rel., ante, 568. The principal subject of controversy is the constitutionality of the apportionment act of March 9, 1903. No point is made by counsel for appellant in regard to the right of the appellee to the remedy of injunction.

For the reasons given in Brooks v. State, ex rel., supra, and without deciding any question in regard to the nature of the proceeding adopted by the appellee, we hold that the said act is unconstitutional, and, on the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling, J.

The only questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, and not waived by the failure of counsel to discuss them, are thekame as in Brooks v. State, ex rel., ante, 568. The principal subject of controversy is the constitutionality of the apportionment act of March 9, 1903. No point is made by counsel for appellant in regard to the right of the appellee to the remedy of injunction.

For the reasons given in Brooks v. State, ex rel., supra, and without deciding any question in regard to the nature of the proceeding adopted by the appellee, we hold that the said act is unconstitutional, and, on the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 N.E. 1142, 162 Ind. 695, 1904 Ind. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-white-ind-1904.