Lindsay v. State

918 So. 2d 399, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 347, 2006 WL 120029
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 2006
DocketNo. 2D05-859
StatusPublished

This text of 918 So. 2d 399 (Lindsay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsay v. State, 918 So. 2d 399, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 347, 2006 WL 120029 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Andre Lindsay’s sentence. We also affirm the costs imposed in conjunction with that sentence. See Waller v. State, 911 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Ridgeway v. State, 892 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridgeway v. State
892 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Waller v. State
911 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 So. 2d 399, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 347, 2006 WL 120029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.