Lindsay v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindsay v. People

29 A.D.3d 911, 814 N.Y.S.2d 545

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.3d 911 (Lindsay v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsay v. People, 29 A.D.3d 911, 814 N.Y.S.2d 545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to respond to the petitioner’s request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6). Application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the Appellate Division does not have subject matter jurisdiction (see CPLR 506 [b]; 7804 [b]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to respond to the petitioner’s request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6). Application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the Appellate Division does not have subject matter jurisdiction (see CPLR 506 [b]; 7804 [b]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.3d 911, 814 N.Y.S.2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-people-nyappdiv-2006.