Lindsay v. Kendrick & Co.

30 Ga. 545
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Ga. 545 (Lindsay v. Kendrick & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsay v. Kendrick & Co., 30 Ga. 545 (Ga. 1860).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lyon, J.,

delivering the opinion.

1. The original draft, with Lindsay’s acceptance on it, or rather the paper which was the foundation of the suit and declared upon as his act, Lindsay not only did not deny, on oath, as required by the statute, in order to put its execution in issue, but at trial term, at common law, confessed a judgment on its evidence, to the plaintiff, and took an appeal. While the appeal was pending, that original paper on which Lindsay had confessed judgment, was burned. These facts, in the absence of a plea denying the paper sued on to be his, were proper to be submitted to the jury, and sufficient to warrant a finding against the defendant.

2. A party is not obliged to establish a lost paper, under the Judiciary Act, but may, by showing its loss or destruction, as in this case, give in secondary evidence of its contents, and upon sufficient proof, recover on it as a lost or destroyed paper. See Ross & Co. vs. Wright, 12 Ga., 509.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trice v. Adams
125 S.E. 878 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Ga. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-kendrick-co-ga-1860.