Lindsay v. Kelley
This text of 395 U.S. 827 (Lindsay v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LINDSAY
v.
KELLEY, SECRETARY OF COMMON-WEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
James E. Beasley for appellant.
William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman for appellee.
Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, and Ralph S. Snyder for the Pennsylvania Bar Assn. as amicus curiae in support of the motion to dismiss.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of the Pennsylvania Bar Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 U.S. 827, 89 S. Ct. 2130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-kelley-scotus-1969.