Lindsay v. Kelley

395 U.S. 827, 89 S. Ct. 2130
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 23, 1969·No. 1370·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

395 U.S. 827 (1969)

LINDSAY
v.
KELLEY, SECRETARY OF COMMON-WEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 1370.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 23, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

James E. Beasley for appellant.

William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman for appellee.

Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, and Ralph S. Snyder for the Pennsylvania Bar Assn. as amicus curiae in support of the motion to dismiss.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Pennsylvania Bar Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsay v. Kelley, 395 U.S. 827, 89 S. Ct. 2130 (1969).

395 U.S. 827 (Lindsay v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodheart v. Casey
565 A.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.
507 A.2d 323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
In Re Jones
476 A.2d 1287 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group v. Secretary of Commonwealth
375 N.E.2d 1175 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Livingston v. Ogilvie
250 N.E.2d 138 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1969)