Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance

20 S.E. 370, 115 N.C. 212

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 370 (Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance, 20 S.E. 370, 115 N.C. 212 (N.C. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The letters of the defendant’s agent to the plaintiff, and his replies thereto, constitute a written contract between the parties. It was for the Court, therefore, to ascertain the intention of the parties and to declare their rights thereunder. Simpson v. Pegram, 112 N. C., 541. The services to be rendered and their value were fixed by that written contract, upon which we think his Honor put the proper construction. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The letters of the defendant’s agent to the plaintiff, and his replies thereto, constitute a written contract between the parties. It was for the Court, therefore, to ascertain the intention of the parties and to declare their rights thereunder. Simpson v. Pegram, 112 N. C., 541. The services to be rendered and their value were fixed by that written contract, upon which we think his Honor put the proper construction. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E. 370, 115 N.C. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-hamburg-bremen-insurance-nc-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack