Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance

20 S.E. 370, 115 N.C. 212
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The letters of the defendant’s agent to the plaintiff, and his replies thereto, constitute a written contract between the parties. It was for the Court, therefore, to ascertain the intention of the parties and to declare their rights thereunder. Simpson v. Pegram, 112 N. C., 541. The services to be rendered and their value were fixed by that written contract, upon which we think his Honor put the proper construction. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance, 20 S.E. 370, 115 N.C. 212 (N.C. 1894).

20 S.E. 370 (Lindsay v. Hamburg Bremen Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Cotton Mills.
52 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)