Home/Supreme Court/Lindsay v. City of San Antonio

Lindsay v. City of San Antonio

484 U.S. 1010, 108 S. Ct. 707, 98 L. Ed. 2d 658, 56 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 157
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 11, 1988
DocketNo. 87-799
StatusPublished
Cited by93 cases

This text of 484 U.S. 1010 (Lindsay v. City of San Antonio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsay v. City of San Antonio, 484 U.S. 1010, 108 S. Ct. 707, 98 L. Ed. 2d 658, 56 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 157 (1988).

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeder-Simco Gmc, Inc. v. Volvo Gm Heavy Truck Corporation, Now Known as Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.
374 F.3d 701 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.
207 F.3d 1039 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
DOUBLE D SPOTTING SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERVALU, INC.; World Super Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
136 F.3d 554 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Wine Markets International Inc. v. Bass
177 F.R.D. 128 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Rosenbloom v. Senior Resource, Inc.
974 F. Supp. 738 (D. Minnesota, 1997)
Lippman v. Sholom Home, Inc.
945 F. Supp. 188 (D. Minnesota, 1996)
Brantley Ex Rel. Brantley v. Independent School District No. 625
936 F. Supp. 649 (D. Minnesota, 1996)
United States v. Castillo-Garcia
920 F. Supp. 1537 (D. Colorado, 1996)
Mary Moore v. Dan Morales, Attorney General, Dan Morales, Attorney General, Adriane Anderson, Etc. v. John B. Holmes, Jr., Dan Morales, Attorney General, Direct Mail Marketing, Inc. v. John Vance, Dan Morales, Attorney General, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. Innovative Database Systems v. Dan Morales, Dan Morales, David O. Chambers v. Steven Hilbig, Dan Morales, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant
63 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Leidig v. Honeywell, Inc.
850 F. Supp. 796 (D. Minnesota, 1994)
Bieter Co. v. Blomquist
848 F. Supp. 1446 (D. Minnesota, 1994)
Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.
847 F. Supp. 1437 (D. Minnesota, 1994)
Tower Ins. Co., Inc. v. Judge
840 F. Supp. 679 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
Burlington Northern Railroad v. Soo Line Railroad
162 B.R. 207 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie
847 F. Supp. 695 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
United States v. Napco International, Inc.
835 F. Supp. 493 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
Wilkes Ex Rel. Yellow v. Steffen
831 F. Supp. 723 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. Winger Associates, Inc.
874 F. Supp. 252 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
Minnesota Pet-Breeders, Inc. v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.
843 F. Supp. 506 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
C.R.S. Ex Rel. D.B.S. v. United States
820 F. Supp. 449 (D. Minnesota, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 U.S. 1010, 108 S. Ct. 707, 98 L. Ed. 2d 658, 56 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-city-of-san-antonio-scotus-1988.