Lindsay v. Chase

104 Mass. 253
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 104 Mass. 253 (Lindsay v. Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsay v. Chase, 104 Mass. 253 (Mass. 1870).

Opinion

By the Court.

Carlton, the payee of the note in suit, indorsed it in blank and delivered it to Kimball, Lindsay & Company. They could then maintain an action against the defendant, as indorsees. When they dissolved, and Lindsay, with the other coplaintiffs, formed a new firm and took the note, they became the indorsees, they being the owners and holders, and the indorsement being still in blank. The instructions were correct. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helmer v. Commercial Bank
44 N.W. 482 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1890)
Haydon v. Nicoletti
18 Nev. 290 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 Mass. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-v-chase-mass-1870.