Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant

190 Misc. 2d 777, 740 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1235
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (DHPD) is vested with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the remaining-family-member claim in city-aided Mitchell-Lama housing (28 RCNY 3-02 [p]; Lindville Hous. Co. v McGann, [778]*778NYLJ, June 24, 1996, at 29, col 6 [App Term, 1st Dept], affd 242 AD2d 479), and its issuance of a certificate of eviction cannot be collaterally attacked in the subsequent summary proceeding (Yorkville Towers Assoc. v Mourino, NYLJ, June 9, 1997, at 29, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]). If appellant felt aggrieved by DHPD’s determination, her remedy was to challenge the DHPD determination in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (id.).

Aronin, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant, 190 Misc. 2d 777, 740 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

190 Misc. 2d 777 (Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ocean Bay RAD, LLC v. Camacho
2025 NY Slip Op 25244 (NYC Civil Court, Queens, 2025)
Bertie v. Norman
2024 NY Slip Op 50293(U) (NYC Civil Court, Kings, 2024)
Cadman Towers, Inc. v. Kaplan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Bedford Gardens Co., LP v. Hecht Jacobowitz
29 A.D.3d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)