Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant

190 Misc. 2d 777, 740 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1235

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 190 Misc. 2d 777 (Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsay Park Housing Corp. v. Grant, 190 Misc. 2d 777, 740 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (DHPD) is vested with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the remaining-family-member claim in city-aided Mitchell-Lama housing (28 RCNY 3-02 [p]; Lindville Hous. Co. v McGann, [778]*778NYLJ, June 24, 1996, at 29, col 6 [App Term, 1st Dept], affd 242 AD2d 479), and its issuance of a certificate of eviction cannot be collaterally attacked in the subsequent summary proceeding (Yorkville Towers Assoc. v Mourino, NYLJ, June 9, 1997, at 29, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]). If appellant felt aggrieved by DHPD’s determination, her remedy was to challenge the DHPD determination in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (id.).

Aronin, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (DHPD) is vested with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the remaining-family-member claim in city-aided Mitchell-Lama housing (28 RCNY 3-02 [p]; Lindville Hous. Co. v McGann, [778]*778NYLJ, June 24, 1996, at 29, col 6 [App Term, 1st Dept], affd 242 AD2d 479), and its issuance of a certificate of eviction cannot be collaterally attacked in the subsequent summary proceeding (Yorkville Towers Assoc. v Mourino, NYLJ, June 9, 1997, at 29, col 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]). If appellant felt aggrieved by DHPD’s determination, her remedy was to challenge the DHPD determination in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (id.).

Aronin, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 Misc. 2d 777, 740 N.Y.S.2d 552, 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsay-park-housing-corp-v-grant-nyappterm-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack