Lindquist v. Danziger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindquist v. Danziger

247 A.D. 907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The action is for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On the trial plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the cause of action for false imprisonment and the jury disagreed on the cause of action for malicious prosecution. Subsequently plaintiff moved to be relieved of her voluntary discontinuance. The Special Term denied the motion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On the trial plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the cause of action for false imprisonment and the jury disagreed on the cause of action for malicious prosecution. Subsequently plaintiff moved to be relieved of her voluntary discontinuance. The Special Term denied the motion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Lindquist v. Danziger, 247 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 907 (Lindquist v. Danziger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.