Lindquist v. Danziger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindquist v. Danziger

247 A.D. 907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 907 (Lindquist v. Danziger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindquist v. Danziger, 247 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The action is for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On the trial plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the cause of action for false imprisonment and the jury disagreed on the cause of action for malicious prosecution. Subsequently plaintiff moved to be relieved of her voluntary discontinuance. The Special Term denied the motion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On the trial plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the cause of action for false imprisonment and the jury disagreed on the cause of action for malicious prosecution. Subsequently plaintiff moved to be relieved of her voluntary discontinuance. The Special Term denied the motion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindquist-v-danziger-nyappdiv-1936.