Lindo v. City of New York

272 A.D.2d 90, 708 N.Y.S.2d 288, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4928

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered March 18, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioner’s application to serve a late notice of claim for malicious prosecution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proposed claim for malicious prosecution, which alleges [91]*91that the underlying criminal prosecution against petitioner was dismissed pursuant to CPL 30.30, is patently without merit (see, Witcher v Children’s Tel. Workshop, 187 AD2d 292; cf., Hankins v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 208 AD2d 111, 115-116). Thus, permission to serve the claim late was properly refused (see, Weiss v City of New York, 237 AD2d 212, 213). Concur — Rubin, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ. [Recalled and vacated, 277 AD2d-(1st Dept., Nov. 16, 2000).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindo v. City of New York, 272 A.D.2d 90, 708 N.Y.S.2d 288, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 90 (Lindo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Witcher v. Children's Television Workshop
187 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Hankins v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
208 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Weiss v. City of New York
237 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)