Lindner v. Hilo Varnish Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lindner v. Hilo Varnish Corp.

233 A.D. 857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 857 (Lindner v. Hilo Varnish Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindner v. Hilo Varnish Corp., 233 A.D. 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to strike out affirmative defenses and counterclaims; order granting motion to add Herman Uehlinger as a party defendant; and order denying said Uehlinger’s motion to set aside service of notice and answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Said Uehlinger may serve his answer to defendants’ pleading within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to strike out affirmative defenses and counterclaims; order granting motion to add Herman Uehlinger as a party defendant; and order denying said Uehlinger’s motion to set aside service of notice and answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Said Uehlinger may serve his answer to defendants’ pleading within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindner-v-hilo-varnish-corp-nyappdiv-1931.