Lindley v. State

17 S.W.2d 47, 112 Tex. Crim. 468, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 417
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 1929
DocketNo. 12507.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 17 S.W.2d 47 (Lindley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindley v. State, 17 S.W.2d 47, 112 Tex. Crim. 468, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 417 (Tex. 1929).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purpose of sale; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

There appears in this record but one bill of exceptions which is made up of ten pages of questions and answers without any certificate of the trial judge that such form is in anywise necessary in order that any matter may be understood by this court. Such bill is uniformly held to be in violation of the rules laid down by the statute and decisions of this court. We are not favored with a brief on behalf of appellant. Examination of the facts discloses that same are amply sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garza v. State
55 S.W.2d 1042 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Youngblood v. State
50 S.W.2d 315 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
McGowan v. State
36 S.W.2d 156 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Burkhart v. State
26 S.W.2d 238 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 S.W.2d 47, 112 Tex. Crim. 468, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindley-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.