Lindgren v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

115 So. 3d 1076, 2013 WL 3014082, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2568·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment of foreclosure as appellant’s affirmative defenses were not conclusively refuted on the record. The trial court relied on the allegations in a verified complaint to refute the defenses. While a verified complaint may serve the same purpose as an affidavit for purposes of a summary judgment, the complaint’s allegations must meet the requirements of the rule governing supporting and opposing affidavits. See Ballinger v. Bay Gulf Credit Union, 51 So.3d 528, 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(e) requires that affidavits must be based on personal knowledge and shall “show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.” A complaint based on “information and belief,” and not personal knowledge, is insufficient. Id. Here, the complaint was not based upon personal knowledge and was insufficient to meet the requirements of the rule.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindgren v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 115 So. 3d 1076, 2013 WL 3014082, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

115 So. 3d 1076 (Lindgren v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estes v. Rodin
259 So. 3d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Houk v. PennyMac Corp.
210 So. 3d 726 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Toyos v. Helm Bank, USA
187 So. 3d 1287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Colon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
162 So. 3d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)