Linderberry v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linderberry v. Wing

270 A.D.2d 887, 705 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 887 (Linderberry v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linderberry v. Wing, 270 A.D.2d 887, 705 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, amended petition granted and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon the consent of the parties, we reverse the judgment of Supreme Court and grant the amended petition, thus annulling the fair hearing decision insofar as it affirmed the determination of the Oswego County Department [888]*888of Social Services to reduce petitioner’s food stamps and vacating the notice that petitioner’s food stamps were reduced. We remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine costs and reasonable counsel fees. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, amended petition granted and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon the consent of the parties, we reverse the judgment of Supreme Court and grant the amended petition, thus annulling the fair hearing decision insofar as it affirmed the determination of the Oswego County Department [888]*888of Social Services to reduce petitioner’s food stamps and vacating the notice that petitioner’s food stamps were reduced. We remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine costs and reasonable counsel fees. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 887, 705 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linderberry-v-wing-nyappdiv-2000.