Linder v. Miller

Fourth Circuit

Linder v. Miller

70 F. App'x 672

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 17, 2003

DocketNo. 03-6812

StatusPublished

This text of 70 F. App'x 672 (Linder v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linder v. Miller, 70 F. App'x 672 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bobby M. Linder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Linder v. Miller, No. CA-02-1885-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bobby M. Linder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Linder v. Miller, No. CA-02-1885-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 F. App'x 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linder-v-miller-ca4-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack