Linder v. Miller

Fourth Circuit

Linder v. Miller

70 F. App'x 672

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2003·No. No. 03-6812·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bobby M. Linder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Linder v. Miller, No. CA-02-1885-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bobby M. Linder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Linder v. Miller, No. CA-02-1885-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Linder v. Miller, 70 F. App'x 672 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

70 F. App'x 672 (Linder v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related