Linder v. Linder

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Linder v. Linder

938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 904, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 532

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 14, 2007

DocketSC 18066

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 938 A.2d 592 (Linder v. Linder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linder v. Linder, 938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 904, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 532 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 28987) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Where an appellant within the twenty day period allowed for the taking of an appeal files in the trial court a motion for extension of time within which to file the appeal, and the trial court grants the motion (but grants it after the period within which to take an appeal has passed), and the appellant files the appeal within the extension period allowed by the trial court, is the appeal untimely filed?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 28987) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Where an appellant within the twenty day period allowed for the taking of an appeal files in the trial court a motion for extension of time within which to file the appeal, and the trial court grants the motion (but grants it after the period within which to take an appeal has passed), and the appellant files the appeal within the extension period allowed by the trial court, is the appeal untimely filed?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 904, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linder-v-linder-conn-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack