Linder v. Levy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linder v. Levy

256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 926 (Linder v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linder v. Levy, 256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action in quantum meruit by a physician for services rendered to a patient. Order granting an examination of defendant before trial modified by providing that the examination under the first decretal paragraph shall be limited to the number of visits and the general nature thereof, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs in the modification of the first decretal paragraph of the order appealed from but dissents as to the affirmance of the second decretal paragraph thereof and votes to modify the order further by striking out the second decretal paragraph, and as thus modified, to affirm. (Williams v. Lewis, 13 App. Div. 130.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action in quantum meruit by a physician for services rendered to a patient. Order granting an examination of defendant before trial modified by providing that the examination under the first decretal paragraph shall be limited to the number of visits and the general nature thereof, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs in the modification of the first decretal paragraph of the order appealed from but dissents as to the affirmance of the second decretal paragraph thereof and votes to modify the order further by striking out the second decretal paragraph, and as thus modified, to affirm. (Williams v. Lewis, 13 App. Div. 130.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 926, 10 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linder-v-levy-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack